Where do i download dnagedcom client v2, version 1.9.8.12

After doing your subscription, it can take up to 30 minutes for the subscription to be processed. If you are sure you already have Microsoft.

NET Framework 4. Save to a folder you will remember, then click on the setup. Again, you may get a warning, please allow the installation file to run. After selecting DNAGedcom Client from your start menu, a small box will come up verifying the application. It may also ask you to confirm an update. When it opens the first time, you will be asked for your DNAGedcom log in and password to verify your subscription.

An incorrect DNAGedcom username or password will cause the program to end. Use the little back arrow in the upper left to go back to the main page. Once you are logged in, the profile drop-down box will show the DNA tests you have in your account.

Choose the test you want to download. The progress bar will then show you when that is complete. Again the progress bar will proceed.

This portion will take much longer than gathering the matches and also depends on the number of matches as well as trees in the DNA account. They were not completed and submitted until mid to end of May. Which version would the results represent? You might try that, and failing that, call Ancestry and ask. I want to let others know of a big problem at Ancestry that as of this date they has not fixed.

Starting 10 months ago I alerted Ancestry to the problem in their computer programs, but nothing is changed. Some documents are even stored in West Virginia categories when they occurred before statehood. I would encourage anyone to push Ancestry to fix this problem. If you are interested, all you have to do, is to type in Wheeling, and the default is always West Virginia. Great summary, Roberta — as always. With a chromosome browser, we might see slightly smaller segments… Certainly almost none larger.

AncestryDNA budged slightly when they added the number of segments and the total cM. With all the data we have now, I think we could place most Hint segments in the right segment if we knew the Chr. And we could usually group Matches with the same surname Hint with that info. Hi Jim, Thanks! Just to clarify for the cM value and segments, it is not obvious at all. If you click on that button, you get the shared centiMorgons and the of segments found.

It was 6 mo. However, I gave up on getting the surnames download that is apparently done by opening every family tree and extracting the names.

Chrome kept locking up and it was taking hours. Finding the cM and segments for an individual was a neat find and am glad Jim mentioned it for others. Biggest disappointment for me was the fact that we can no longer transfer Ancestry results easily to ftdna. They say they are working on it but give no date.

I think ftdna may just want to sell more kits. The downloaded file includes the shared cMs and segment data. I suspect that change can have a major impact when using triangulation since it is no longer and apples to apples comparison.

I suspect there is more of an impact than realized with the more distant matches 3C and beyond. Think an analysis of the impact of the differences across all five versions of tests ancestry v1 and v2, 23andMe V3 and V4, and FTDNA needs to be completed at some point.

That is a large undertaking. There maybe more than a couple of articles:. The only thing that changes is the length of the shared segment. The shared segment should be at the same location, and more importantly, from the same Common Ancestor. The shared DNA is a fixed item; the only thing is how much of the shared segment is sampled. The very few that drop out tend to be small, speculative, segments to start with.

Triangulation will be virtually unaffected when in doubt, just drop the comparison threshold to SNPs and 5cM. Important observation, this. Maybe eventually someone will come up with how many SNPs are needed for a good match with these new chips.

Could it be that the V2 results dont show that info to DNAgedcom anymore? The Client does provide the total number of shared segments and the total shared CMs. Hope that clarifies. I think more than the length of the segments changed I suspect that some segments may have changed entirely for the more distant matches 4C and beyond.

Have anecdotally seen that already when looking at siblings matches where one sibling is a V1 and another is a V2. Plan to do my own analysis, hopefully by the end of the year. I have a number of ancestry matches at GEDmatch that we have confirmed our common ancestor via triangulation. I put that in my address field so you see please attach your tree to your results. Along with begging everyone to upload to Gedmatch!

Thanks for investigating, Ancestry engineering the modfied chip to be compatible within its system is not surprising. The real problem is what happens with GEDmatch. I would like to see you compare your old and new Ancestry kits with the same kits on GEDmatch, both with default parameters and reduced parameters. As you look at shorter segment matches, I think you will see the problems,.

Jack, I am with you on this. I have a 4th to 6th cousin match who showed 57 centimorgans shared across 3 DNA segments on Ancestry. When I downloaded the raw data and put into Gedmatch, it shows that we share Should I assume that Timber removed all of the small segment matches?

I love your summary Roberta. I have a question though. My test was received on May 12 and the results were posted on May I ordered my sister-in-laws kit with ancestry planning to transfer it to ftdna where her brothers kit is. I had ordered 3 kits at nearly the same time. Her kit was two days later than the other two and will not transfer to ftdna.

Very disappointing. Also most of my nads are the husband of an ancestor. I have found some reoccurring names that I know nothing about. Do I put them in a separate tree as if looking for adoption information? One family says that because I match with a first cousin of their mother that I am matching on the maternal side — when the paternal family consistently matches other findings.

The NADs take a while to show up on V2. I got 8 after waiting 2 months. So, they may show up for you! If you really like it there is a way to help support the product written by an AncestryDNA user. AncestryDNA Helper also has some additional search tools like username, notes and you can compare your kits for common matches and phase kits. The initial scan can take a while depending on how many kits you manage and the number of matches for each kit. Thanks Lisa. You can download your list of matches into an Excel spreadsheet.

It was amazing to see how many unshaved matches 4th cousin and back we had. They were processed right around the changeover in May ! My 3-year-old cry for support with outgoing in-app messages has never been resolved. In fact, you recently closed my last Ancestry Support Case — — without even following up by telling me why.

The last time I phoned, the lady promised me a 3 month complimentary sub when my paid one ran out. We automatically renew our membership packages to make sure our members always have access to their discoveries and family history tools. You shift the burden on us users to call you, instead of allowing me to e-mail.

Is this your business strategy? Too big to fail? Based on this observation may I suggest that you consider visiting a local Family History Center you can find them from FamilySearch. From my perspective this Could mean that if one could locate Mormons that are also involved in DNA this could lead to a group that by definition works with Ancestry and likely Ancestry DNA.

Hope this hint may be of some help. Hi Roberta I tested on the V1 chip and my mother on the V2. Some of our matches are showing as sharing a larger segment with me than they share with my mother. Which I thought would be impossible unless they were also related to my father Is this caused by the chip difference?

I have always read online ancestry that the would retest the samples and update every time they had an update. So your saying that is not true? Can you please find that link where Ancestry said that and post it? That is not true to the best of my knowledge. When they released the new version, this was discussed on the conference call, as was the need for current V1 testers to upgrade to V2, which is when Ancestry said that was not going to be necessary. In order for that to happen, Ancestry would have to save your DNA sample and then rerun every single one of the 2 million tests.

After time, some of the samples are not viable and in time, there will be no DNA left to rerun. So this is clearly not feasible for Ancestry from a number of different perspectives.

Maybe I misunderstood and that is possible as I had a stroke a year ago. But I have had several updates and it said it had been. Updated and my circles increased and had better matches. Maybe I misinterpreted the information. I will look and if I see something I will post it if I do. Prayers for your healing from the stroke. Maybe that was what I read. I have a hard time understanding all the lingo. I appreciate tell column for information buto I need like ancestry and gedmatch for real dummies.